Polk Sub:

Not available soon , but already there and very good VFm.beaten others by a great margin.forget sonodyne now they have excellent floor standers at 24k the monitor 60.why don't you drop in for a listen

Mohan,

How would you compare the Polk Monitor 60 with Wharfedale Diamonds. The polks seem to have a better build quality. But how do they sound?

Aly,

For that you have to have a good comparision.but i somehow feel Polk's are better as my brother who's heard them gave me favourable review.Youcan cheack them as they are in Profx.

Mohan,
I agree with you that a side-bt-side comparo will give a much better picture but eventhen have you heard the Diamond 8.4 recently ?

And how about a comparision between your Klipsch and the Polk Monitor 60 and Monitor 70 ?? Now you are in a trap.....

look they are in entirely diffrent league...

Klipsch is big with two 20.3 cm ceramettalic aluminium cone woofers and huge cabinet volume with 8" Tractrix horn - titanium tweeter with 98db/w/m efficiency and monitor's are slim with 5 inch woofers with a silk tweeter with around 88db/w/m efficiency, but i really need to make a listen coz if not Klipsch I was looking at Polk monitor 60's...

I agree with you that a side-bt-side comparo will give a much better picture but eventhen have you heard the Diamond 8.4 recently ?

regarding this one of my friend has Wharfs as fronts for his HT and he has listened to Polk this week even he felt polks had better imaging and tighter bass, but I have to check out.